MGMT627 GDB NO. 1 SPRING 2023 || 100% RIGHT SOLUTION || PROJECT MANAGEMENT || BY VuTech

Visit Website For More Solutions
www.vutechofficial.blogspot.com

KINDLY, DON’T COPY PASTE

GDB

Suppose your organization is going to implement a new social development project. You have been given an assignment to conduct the feasibility study, and after your analysis, you find that results of the study are negative and suggest that organization can move forward with these results.

Requirement:

Why do you think that the project may be started even if the results of the feasibility study are negative? Justify your answer with proper reasons.

SOLUTION:

Despite the negative results of the feasibility study, there may still be valid reasons for an organization to consider moving forward with a social development project. Here are some justifications for proceeding with the project:

Broader Social Impact:

The feasibility study might focus on narrow indicators and fail to capture the potential broader social impact of the project. While the study may highlight certain challenges or risks, it might not fully account for the positive long-term effects or indirect benefits that the project could generate. It is essential to consider the potential transformative impact the project might have on individuals, communities, or society as a whole.

Iterative Approach:

Negative results in the feasibility study can be seen as an opportunity for improvement rather than a definitive conclusion. The organization can use the findings as a starting point to refine the project design, address identified shortcomings, and explore alternative strategies to mitigate the identified risks. By embracing an iterative approach, the organization can learn from the feasibility study and adapt the project accordingly.

Stakeholder Engagement:

The feasibility study might not have adequately considered the perspectives and needs of all relevant stakeholders. Engaging with key stakeholders, such as community members, local organizations, or experts in the field, can provide valuable insights that challenge or complement the findings of the study. By involving stakeholders in the decision-making process, the organization can gain a more comprehensive understanding of the project's potential and build support for its implementation.

Long-term Vision:

Sometimes, a project might have long-term goals that extend beyond the scope of the feasibility study. While the study focuses on short-term viability, the organization may have a broader vision or a strategic plan that justifies the project in the context of its overall mission and objectives. In such cases, the negative results of the feasibility study might be weighed against the long-term benefits or alignment with the organization's core values.

Learning Opportunity:

Negative results can provide valuable lessons and insights for the organization. Even if the project is not feasible in its current form, the feasibility study can highlight areas where improvements or modifications can be made. By embracing the findings and using them as a learning opportunity, the organization can enhance its understanding of the challenges and risks associated with the project and incorporate this knowledge into future initiatives.

It is important to note that the decision to proceed with a project despite negative feasibility study results should be made carefully, considering the specific circumstances, available resources, and the organization's risk appetite. Proper risk management, continuous evaluation, and a commitment to learning and adaptation are crucial in mitigating potential challenges and maximizing the chances of project success.

KINDLY, DON’T COPY PASTE
SUBSCRIBE, SHARE, LIKE AND COMMENTS FOR MORE UPDATES
SEND WHATSAPP OR E-MAIL FOR ANY QUERY
0325-6644800
kamranhameedvu@gmail.com
Visit Website For More Solutions
www.vutechofficial.blogspot.com