EDU406 ASSIGNMENT 1 SOLUTION FALL 2023 | EDU406 ASSIGNMENT 1 SOLUTION 2023
| EDU406 ASSIGNMENT 1 2023 | CRITICAL THINKING AND REFLECTIVE PRACTICE |
VuTech
Visit Website For More Solutions
www.vutechofficial.blogspot.com
KINDLY, DON’T COPY PASTE
Question No. 1
Critically analyze the reflection models of David Boud (1985) and Atkins
& Murphy (1994). Also, suggest which one is more suitable in terms of
its application and why?
Answer:
David Boud's Reflective Model (1985) and Atkins & Murphy's Reflective
Cycle (1994) are both influential frameworks used in educational and
professional settings to guide reflective practice. Each model emphasizes
the importance of reflecting on experiences to enhance learning and
personal/professional development. Let's analyze both models and consider
their strengths and weaknesses.
David Boud's Reflective Model (1985):
Boud's model consists of three key stages:
Return of Experience (ROE):
This stage involves recollection of the experience and what happened during
the event or situation.
Attending to Feelings:
It emphasizes the exploration of emotions and reactions experienced
during the event.
Re-evaluation:
This stage involves critical analysis and evaluation of the experience,
identifying what went well, what could be improved, and why.
Strengths:
Simple and straight forward:
The three-stage process is easy to understand and apply.
Emphasis on emotions:
It encourages individuals to explore and understand their emotional
responses to experiences, contributing to a deeper level of
reflection.
Weaknesses:
Lack of specific guidance:
The model is relatively broad and may not offer explicit guidance on how
to analyze or act upon reflections.
Limited focus:
It might not encourage comprehensive consideration of all aspects of an
experience.
Atkins & Murphy's Reflective Cycle (1994):
Their model consists of four stages:
Description:
Describing the experience in detail, including the context and the events
that occurred.
Feelings:
Reflecting on emotions and thoughts during the experience.
Evaluation:
Analyzing the positive and negative aspects of the experience,
considering what worked well and what could be improved.
Analysis/Conclusion:
Drawing conclusions from the experience, including what could have been
done differently, and considering future actions.
Strengths:
Comprehensive structure:
The four-stage cycle provides a systematic framework that encourages
thorough reflection.
Action-oriented:
Encourages consideration of future actions, making it more practical for
implementing changes based on reflections.
Weaknesses:
May be time-consuming:
The structured approach might feel rigid and lengthy, potentially
discouraging some individuals from engaging in reflective practice.
Emphasis on description:
The emphasis on detailed description in the initial stages might lead to
an overemphasis on recounting events rather than critical analysis.
Suitability and Application:
The choice between the two models largely depends on the context and
preferences of the individual engaging in reflective practice. Boud's
model is simpler and emphasizes emotional exploration, making it suitable
for situations where emotional understanding and simplicity are valued. On
the other hand, Atkins & Murphy's model offers a more structured
approach, making it suitable for instances where a comprehensive and
systematic analysis of experiences is desired, despite potentially being
more time-consuming.
Both models have their strengths and weaknesses, and the most suitable
model depends on the specific needs of the individual or the context in
which reflective practice is being applied. Combining elements from both
models might also be beneficial to create a personalized reflective approach
that suits the needs of the individual or situation.
KINDLY, DON’T COPY PASTE
SUBSCRIBE, SHARE, LIKE AND COMMENTS FOR MORE UPDATES
SEND WHATSAPP OR E-MAIL FOR ANY QUERY
0325-6644800
kamranhameedvu@gmail.com
Visit Website For More Solutions
www.vutechofficial.blogspot.com